In defense of a computerized government

I am a scientist,but to be a technocrat would put me out of business as a man. Yet I was eighteen months ago, intent on creating a scientific way of governing. And here today, proud of the tools we have made. Why? Because I believe that cybernetics can do the job better than bureaucracy - and more humanely too.

Stafford Beer, 1926 - 2002

http://ada.evergreen.edu/~arunc/texts/cybernetics/beer/book.pdf

>>4,5,6
GET OUT, go spam about jews somewhere else, PLEASE.

Now, on topic, Stafford Beer seemed like a good old chap. A little extremist on his views, but, i guess you have to go to the extreme to have extreme changes.

I like the idea of changing politicians by programs (as long as they are open source), and, in fact, if you think about it, programs are the most effective laws. They are always applied, and can't be corrupted (inb4 hax my anus). In sum, a law written in a computer is much more effective that one written by lawywers on congress.