Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Which loop is faster?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 8:59


for (I = 0; I < N; I++)
  for (J = 0; J < M; J++)
    update(Xs[I][J]);

or

for (I = 0; I < N; I++)
  for (J = 0; J < M; J++)
    update(Xs[J][I]);

???

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:36

>>119
It's easy to make something really basic, but making an exception system in C that is nestable, scalable, safe and thread safe is difficult.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:44

>>121
I used to make an exception system in C that is nestable, scalable, safe and thread safe, but then I took an arrow in the knee.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:46

>>122
Bro, I think it's time for you to go.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:47

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:48

>>124
The closest you're going to get I think is something like
#(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:49

>>121
You don't belong here.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 14:51

>>126
You're free to post an implementation, the ones I've seen from /prog/ have not been anywhere near thread-safe or infinitely nestable.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 15:19

And when you're on it make sure it's signal safe as well.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-16 20:11

>>49

i = 0;
i = 0;
i = 0;
i = 0;
i = 0;
i = 0;

god you're fucking retarded.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List