Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Syntax families

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-15 13:48

How many syntax families are there /prog/?
Lisp: All the lisps, homoiconic and syntax takes 2 seconds to learn, parsing is LL(0) easy.
Pascal: A bunch of languages, some can apparently compile in a single pass.
C: C and perhaps some other ones. C requires a symbol table to disambiguate, parsing by `maximal munch'.
Curlies: The only thing in common with C is they both have curlies and both are imperative, the scripting languages often don't require the symbol table.
Prolog: Prolog and Erlang, homoiconic but a bitch to write in, parsing is ``easy'' as its just a long string of weighted operators (maybe APL is loosely related).
strtok'ers: Forth and the rest of these. `Parser' can be strtok.
Full Retard: C++

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-15 21:35

>>15

The stack based languages that I've seen support storing code in an array, modification to the array, and then execution of the array of code. I've used that to implement macros in postscript before. No one uses postscript anymore ;_; I'll have to make C bindings for networking with it. ( =_=)

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List