>>72
There is no light without dark. You can sense emptiness only relative to something.
>>70
not in my playroom. I have infinite dominoes, and I watch them topple all day long, for eternity.
You have autism. Also, note, in some countries, the term "autism" is considered to be a lighter form of schizophrenia, because it sometimes progresses into it. So you are a potential schizo/psycho.
If you would just fucking study it
How can one study something, he doesn't understand. "Set Theory" is axiom, meaning one should have inborn understanding of it. I dont have. I cant imagine "a set", this highly abstract, invisible, unordered and unbounded entity.
I have no idea how you could talk about it without some form of math.
Lisp's lambda (in it's call-by-name form) allows proving sensible theorems without any math. And lambda is a physical entity. Of course lambda has its "problems", but these problems manifest themselves only in the presence of "infinity", meaning they aren't really problems, but the way systems shows us, that we doing something wrong.
You could define it by algorithmic complexity, such as Kolmogorov complexity. God is very complex in popular definitions and almost everyone has different definitions.
Sorry, I dont understand terms "algorithmic complexity" and "Kolmogorov". The notion of "mathematical complexity" is by itself pretty complex for my little goy brains.
There are many more choices than that.
For me, there are only choices I see. Making hypotheses without confirming data would be a waste of time. Even the most crazy projects, like SETI, have some confirming data.
Replacement copy? Would 'you' still be conscious?
What is "consciousness"? It's a vague term. I'm afraid, you yourself don't see what you're talking about.
I should stop responding, but at times it makes me think that he probably believes what he's saying
I do believe what I'm saying, because I havent seen better theory, than subjective idealism.
which makes me wonder if he realizes that his beliefs might not be consistent(free of contradictions).
"consistency" is a buzzword and in reality, there are no contradictions, except those we invent/define.