>>187
What? What does this have to do with God
Why does a scientist care why his theory doesn't predict the existence of God?
reality is what I obtain by deduction and induction through senses and thought.
How did you obtain the "deduction" and "induction" themself?
Cantor did pioneer an important mathematical technique - diagonalization
"important" for whom? I dont see its importance or relevance to the observable reality.
it's not like the people that wrote that work are unknown and you cannot check their credentials and reputations: almost all are professors and have Ph. d's., and more than half are even well-known within their fields.
Sorry, but Phd wont confirm your theory. Phd is just a title, you can buy if you have enough money and/or time.
I figured that if you're not educated enough to understand some of those papers (even though some are not hard at all to understand), a novel from a good hard sci-fi author on the subject would at least make it easier for you to understand certain concepts.
There is a reason I'm not educated - I cant enter education due to disagreement with concepts of Set Theory and modern mathematics. A sci-fi novel wont fix that.
The author is so serious about his work being as accurate as possible that he even wrote a manual on general realitivy and quantum mechanics
What did you say?! The novelist is so serious, he even wrote comments on other sci-fi novels to supplement his Electric Boogaloo? Sounds like a typical case of copyright infringement. Einstein's family will sue him for stealing fantasy worlds and characters. It's like when you take Lord of The Rings and make sequel, without having license from the owner.