Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Mathematics is shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 1:19

Just look at these ugly swatches of code:
http://www.cse.unt.edu/~idl99/Proceedings/ahn/img50.gif
http://www.cse.unt.edu/~idl99/Proceedings/ahn/node8.html

That is what you get, when programming immitates math. Even Java and PHP looks beautiful compared to that. Mathematics should be banned as a harmful and obfuscated teaching.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-09 15:04

>>69
What happens if I have some function called f defined over a set of natural numbers that doesn't satisfy either the onto on one-to-one condition that is necessary for countability?
We were talking about the set of naturals, not on functions defined on them.

As for the other posts: most of the posts were talking about naturals, not reals. An upper bound for a set of naturals just means the set has a finite cardinality.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List