>>55
Heh, no point in arguing with you, it's apparent that you consider yourself such a competent programmer to not see the obvious advantage to change part of the source code for forwards compatibility.
Now, tell me, why aren't there
<stdinline.h> and
<stdrestrict.h>, yet we've got
<stdbool.h> in the same standard (C99), and
<stdatomic.h> and
<stdnoreturn.h>? Were the people in the C99 committee made of competent programmers? Are the people in the C11 committee competent programmers, then?