Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C++ hatred

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-08 12:26

Why is C++ hated so much here in /prog/? Many good software are written in C++.

I'm aware that there are some problems in the language and it is considered "hard" to master it, but why do so many people hate it? What harm has it done?

Software can be written much quicker when using some scripting languages like Python. Software can be writte slightly quicker when using some managed language like Java. But when using those languages, the resulting program will require more resources to run. So there is place for C++.

For example, I bet the web browser of 99% people browsing /prog/ is written in C++. It's not perfect language, but it is the best language for complex program with relatively small CPU and RAM requirements.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:05

>>197
But that's all that he has ever had.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:05

>>199
No, it's an example from you uneducated faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:05

>>199
>>198
So, you hate yourself and are samefagging.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:06

>>202
Look, now he can't even form simple sentences anymore, he's breaking down completely now.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer? 2012-01-10 17:07

>>199
And what happens if I have something like

{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10}

{5} --> {1}
{7} --> {1}
{9} --> {1}

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:08

>>205
And now what happens if I extend this to some large number N? How would I determine how many {1}'s I have in this case?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:09

>>205
that would be a surjective mapping. i don't know what your point is

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:09

>>204
Go 'lol' some more for your grade school friends you fucking retard.

Name: Alpha Male !gD3Op2fhHs 2012-01-10 17:10

Hey Kodak this might not be a good moment to tell you, but I kind of banged that chick you think is cute, you know that chick from work? Good luck though brah, I'm sure if you scrub some more toilets that you'll be able to afford that leg extension operation you wanted so you'll no longer be as much of a pathetic manlet, you'll still be beta though so no chicks will bang you except for perhaps 3/10 chicks that are drunk.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-10 17:10

>>207
The point is that I can't determine how many {1}'s I have in this set. In other words, it would be uncountable.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:12

>>205
Nothing, {5}, {7} and {9} are all countable just like {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10}, so the proposition is still true. Keep trying and failing though.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:12

>>209
Yeah, that's about the extend of your IQ. BTW, you're still a huge fucking faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:13

>>210
Well then whatever set you're talking about isn't a subset of {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10} so you have proven nothing, if it were then it would be countable.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-10 17:13

>>211
I was asking for the number of duplicate {1}'s.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:14

>>210
You're a high school dropout, aren't you?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:15

>>213
{5} -> {1} ===> {{5}, {1}}

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:15

>>214
Then you're not talking about any subset of {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10} so you've achieved nothing. The proposition states that any subset of a countable set is countable, how is this difficult?

Do you even know what a subset is?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:15

>>215
You still don't get it, do you. Again, do I determine the number of {1}'s in this kind of scenario?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:16

>>216
Still, what is your point? Neither {5} or {1} is in {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10} so neither of those are subsets.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:16

>>217
I want how I would determine the number of {1}'s that are generated from this set of numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:17

>>219
You still haven't answer my question.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:17

>>218
Again, do I determine the number of {1}'s in this kind of scenario?
I have no fucking clue but it's completely irrelevant to the matter at hand.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:18

>>221
Your question has absolutely nothing to do with the proposition that every subset of a countable set is countable, so there's no point in answering it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:19

>>214
I was asking for the number of duplicate {1}'s.
Sets can't have duplicates.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-10 17:19

>>222
That's why you have no future as a computer programmer. You don't know when this kind of situtation would arise nor do you know how you would approach such a programming problem.

Now shut up and go google more shit.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:19

>>224
His question isn't well defined anyway, he's just rambling about some random unrelated shit in an attempt to look smart.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:20

>>224
But what it maps to can.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:20

>>225
What the fuck are you smoking you fucking retard? What you asked has nothing to do with the statement that every subset of a countable set is countable.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:21

>>226
It's a programming problem from work you mental midget.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:21

It's the ``in Lisp'' guy all over again.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:22

>>229
And what does it have to do with the statement that every subset of a countable set is also countable? Because that's still fucking true, it will always hold true and you're a fucking retard for denying it.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:22

>>229
Do your own (home)work.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-10 17:22

>>228
Shut up and let the adults talk. Better yet, go run off and 'lol' with your grade school friends.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:23

>>205,206,214
This is the worst strawman I have ever seen.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!kCq+A64Losi56ze 2012-01-10 17:24

>>232
No, again, it's a problem that arose during a programming project at work. I don't know many many more times I have to repeat this for you.

So now, on a more positive note, are you going to take the $10/hr tech support job?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:25

>>210
Yes but that uncountable set wouldn't be the subset of a countable set, so the proposition is still true.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:25

>>210
If they all map to 1, then the set only has one element, which is 1. What are you saying?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:26

>>235
That's cute, yes. We're not here to solve your cute, broken math programming projects.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:27

>>237
Yeah.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-10 17:27

>>210
Kodak, just answer a single thing, how does this disprove the statement that every subset of a countable set is also countable?
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -