>>48
guys. vtables are not hard to implement. message-passing is not hard either.
Correct. vtables are very easy to implement and incorrect for the task at hand. I don't understand what you mean by `message-passing' in the context of promoting C++. It sure as hell doesn't support it.
fuck guys. Sepples ain't magic.
Also correct. It's a solution to a problem that doesn't even really exist: ``how to make C object-oriented?''
vtables are an ugly hack. Anyone who has ever been exposed to an actual object-oriented language would look at them and nod her head in disbelief. The only correct way to implement object-orientation in C is to write a compiler for an object-oriented language.