monopoly redesign

How would you design monopoly without the element of chance?

>>1
counter system like rock/paper/scissors

>>2
The choice and outcome is still effectively random.

>>3
If you pick randomly paper, it must be countered by scissors which would make the flow of the game fixed at the point of choice(assuming rational choice) thus removing any chance beyond the initial paper choice.
Such thing often occur in depth searches on chess positions, where there is long series of forcing moves which only have one choice.

>>4
I think you may have flawed logic, the best strategy in (Rock, Paper, Scissors) RPS is to pick as randomly as possible lest your opponent discover a pattern in your play. This would not only become a game of chance but one of as much chance as possible.

>>5
I'm an RPS champion. My strategy is one of intuition. I have a knack at being able to get in my opponent's head and keep one or two moves ahead of them by applying meta-patterns.

>>1
The game requires two rules.
1. Among the people playing, elect one to take on the responsibilities of the banker. (If there is a tie, the eldest among the tied players is the banker.)
2. The banker wins.                  
                                  
                                       

>>7
What would you do? ---You'd do your job. Sonderkommando: King for a Day.

Put the chance and community chest cards in a predetermined and known to all order.
For each roll of the dice, the current player must play a game of Go against an opponent, chosen by rotation. The winner may choose any configuration of the dice. Games played while in jail are done with a handicap.

>>9
lol

Variables outside of game play must be incorporated somehow. Here is an idea: -

Map the current housing market prices to a board and allow the players to chose a limited reign over a region of the map, asynchronous play might be possible, any profits or looses accrued can be reflected in region ownership.

Strategy is determined by adjusting focus of ownership/breadth of ownership/rates of growth/trading prowess.

Winner is that with largest profit.

>>7
I was half expecting a mention of JEWS.

>>12 Are there non-JEWS bankers?