>>39
You do have a point, but I've never seen something like that happening with either Java (or Common Lisp).
Oh wait. You have to make the user install the "interpreter", right? That's fair. Like, rather the same to have him install the non-standard/portable library in his system, in the first place.
Now, Common Lisp indeed has a couple of advantages over C. But. Java?
"Portable." Lol