Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Fuck Math

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 18:58

Any language that allows shit like this should be outlawed.

let A=1
let B=A
A²=B²
A²=AB and
A²-B²=A²-AB
(A+B)(A-B)=A(A-B)
(A+B)=A
2=1.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:02

Math doesn't allow this because you divide by A-B which given that B=A is 0 and thus your program relies on undefined behavior.IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:24

proof that 1 = 2: multiply both sides by zero to get 0 = 0 which is true. therefore 1 = 2. QED

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:27

1/0 =

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:29

You're stupid and can't do math right.
You start by saying that A=B, then you proceed to multiply something by A-B or 0, then you proceed to divide by 0 and complain that your nonsensical string of symbols led you to nonsense.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:33

>>4 Please stop posting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:38

>>5
nonsensical string of symbols

if that's all you think math is no wonder you don't understand it

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:39

A-B = 0. You're trying to divide by 0.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:43

>>3,4,6,7,8
Please stop posting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:51

>>8
cHUCK noRRIS CAN GO THIS, ASK HIM HOW. iF HE DOENT ROUNDHOUSE KICK YOU HEAD CLEAN OFF OF YOUR NECK GET BACK TO US WITH A PROPER ANSWER PLEASE

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:52

>>7
It does not follow from B=A and (A+B)(A-B)=A(A-B) that (A+B)=A. Simple as that. It would only follow that if A did not equal B. You've performed an error in your proof.

Name: >>11 2011-11-06 19:55

s/if A did not equal B/if A did not equal B or if A=B=0//

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 20:11

>>9
Why? What's wrong with our logic?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 20:11

Mathematics has really bad support for Exceptions.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 20:23

>>14
yeah you're supposed to know about them ahead of time.

>>1
this is a really old math troll for grade 10 math students.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 22:58

proof that infinity doesn't exist

Name: Fuck Calculus 2011-11-06 23:17

Any language that allows shit like this should be outlawed.

(lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) = (lim(b+1) as (b → a))
(lim(a+1) as (a → 0))(lim(a+1) as (a → 0))=(lim(a+1) as (a → 0))(lim(b+1) as (b → a))
(lim(a+1) as (a → 0))(lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) - (lim(b+1) as (b → a))(lim(b+1) as (b → a)) = (lim(a+1) as (a → 0))(lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) - (lim(a+1) as (a → 0))(lim(b+1) as (b → a))

((lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) + (lim(b+1) as (b → a)))((lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) - (lim(b+1) as (b → a)))=(lim(a+1) as (a → 0))((lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) - (lim(b+1) as (b → a)))

((lim(a+1) as (a → 0)) + (lim(b+1) as (b → a))) = (lim(a+1) as (a → 0))
2(1+0)=2(1)
2=2

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 13:55

>>17
bullshit

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 19:10

>>17
what the fuck is a lim?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 19:46

>>19
A limit, you high-school dropout.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 19:51

>>20
what the fuck is a limit?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 19:56

>>21
"Limit" is a pseudoscientific term. Like "torsion field" or "perpetuum mobile". It was invented by jews, who want you to believe that space can be devided into "infinitesimal" parts. It is probably a part of their massonic rituals.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 20:20

>>20
then why not just say limit?

fuck math is stupid

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 20:22

>>23
why not just say unmount? why umount?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 20:24

>>24
i know right? and what the fuck is up with /usr/ ?was that much space saved by dropping the E?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 21:25

>>22
I agree that the Jews who have relentlessly classified limits and infinitesimals as numbers are deceitful liars of the worst kind. But if you instead treat limits for what they truly are, computable recursive processes, and change your formal system to allow performing transformations on computable recursive processes using category theory as a starting point, then you can still arrive at meaningful results without invoking acts of God. The results of limits are nothing more than asymptotic boundaries incident to the underlying computable processes that they model.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 21:41

Oh shit, ultra-finitism is a virus spreading exponentially. The fucking Chamalal from Dagestan did a good job with his spam. I'm off now, got to find myself a synagogue.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 21:46

>>27
You are mistaken, I am not an ultra-finitist. I am a classical finitist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 22:06

>>27
The modern field of physics has arrived at ultra-finitism. It is no longer an intuition. The finitists have been vindicated, and the Jews have been exposed as the snake-oil salesmen that they truly are.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 23:01

>>25
/usr stands for UNIX SYSTEM RESOURCES

now shut up, Nigger

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 23:20

>>30
no it doesnt

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 23:29

>>30
long time ago /usr was used instead of /home

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-08 0:22

<--- check the dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-08 0:26

>>32
It still is on Plan 9.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-08 10:43

>>30
This is a lie spread by revisiomist Jews.

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-30 0:37

How do we know that the Jews are not spreading ultra-finitism because infinity offends Yahweh?

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-30 1:35

>>36
oh shit

Name: Anonymous 2012-01-30 8:11

>>30
Fucktards yelling "I know right?" never had a clue.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List