Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Computer Science is the purest science

Name: Anonymous 2011-10-28 16:08

It's the only system that can use itself to prove itself

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:38

>>119
Tags are just integers, not mathematical "sets".

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:41

>>121

And what's an integer in programming? It's a range of numbers you fucking idiot. Again you suck. And again, you have no possible future as a computer programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:43

>>122
Integer is a memory cell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:46

>>123
And integer represents a range of finite number. This in turn represents a finite set. The element of this set is a number that gets stored in a memory cell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:48

>>123
But I don't expect some idiot with zero scholastic aptitude to comprehend this.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:51

>>121

No. Dynamic languages are still typed; its just that a variable's type is not manifest to you or your program until it's actually running.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:54

>>124
Nope. It's just a memory cell, you can work with using machine code.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:55

>>126
Dynamic languages are still typed;
That is just your jewish imagination.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:57

>>128

shit, i need to find my angloid imagination.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 15:58

>>129
Pure races have no imagination, they see the world as it is.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:00

>>130

You don't have to remember very much, when you always tell the truth.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:03

>>131
truth is subjective.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:08

>>132

so are you.

Name: kodak_gallery_programmer !!RUok9kNlfAMW6vT 2011-11-06 16:18

>>127
You aren't making the difference between what is known as the 'abstract machine' and the 'actual machine'. Geeze, have you ever considered taking some kind of computer programming class? Just curious. It might help your apparent confusion.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:28

>>134
abstract machine
That is just your jewish imagination.

have you ever considered taking some kind of computer programming class
Classes have nothing useful, only Set Theory bullshit.

I once wanted to be a psycholigist, but modern psychology relies heavily on Set Theory, so it must be a jewish pseudoscience. That is why I have choosen programming instead, as it's purely empirical.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:44

>>132
It is objective in math, at least as long as your axiomatic system is consistent (free of paradoxes).

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:51

>>136
It is objective in religion, at least as long as your dogmatic system is consistent (free of non-believers).

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:55

>>137
Math isn't insisting on its truth, it's merely defining truth within some system and if that system is true, then other true statements follow.
If A then B is not the same as stating that A is true.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 16:56

>>135
Not according to section 1 under 5.1.2.3 Program execution in the ANSI/ISO C standard you fucking jew.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 17:08

>>139
C/C++ is obsolete.

>>138
Religion isn't insisting on its truth, it's merely defining truth within some diocese and if that dogmas are true, then other true statements follow.
If God then Man is not the same as stating that God is true.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 17:30

>>140
It seems to me that you define any belief as religion. You can't function without any sort of beliefs (about the environment, the world, how stuff seems to behave, and so on). My belief are updatable and probabilistic, I don't mind being wrong as long as I can update my beliefs to be less wrong when evidence contradicts them.
I'll stop arguing with you as if you advocate holding no beliefs, you're merely lying to yourself as your mind still holds some, you're just not consciously thinking about them, but unlike you, I prefer to consciously think and change them as I see fit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-06 19:32

>>128
Dynamic languages are still typed. Prove me wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 4:20

Mathematics's

s's

exit(badarg).

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 4:46

Mathematics's


s's


exit(badarg).


spellcheck.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 7:37

s/s's/s

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-07 8:50

>>145
s/s's/s'/
FTFY

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-21 13:23

Is mathematics created or discovered?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-21 13:26

>>147
depends on what you mean by ``mathematics''

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-21 16:53

>>148
2 + 2 = 4

Was this statement created or discovered?

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-21 17:39

>>149
Yes.

Name: !!M8okqD4wRfs+xmp 2012-01-10 20:24

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -