Structure and Interpretation of Clojure Progs

Interesting to read the reactions to @richhickey's keynote. Sussman gives standing O while some people completely disagree #strangeloop
That's it, Sussman enthusiastically approves Clojure. What's your reason to not use it again?

>>6
It has nothing to do with ``irrational religious prejudice''
Hardly. I asked for actual reasons and you answered with one word ``JVM" without any specific reasoning. In this form it can only mean ''JVM is bad because it's JVM". This is religious thinking.

You asked for a reason to not use it, I gave you
You did. But why do you think the reason you gave can't be irrational? It is and I pointed it out.