/prog/ - Linux sucks

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 10:47

I'm copying 200 GB to Truecrypt partition and it freezes system every two minutes. Who wrote IO? Some moron, apperantly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:11

Linux sucks and water is quite wet. Thank you for your contribution.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:58

>>1
truecrypt partitions are FAT32.

use LUKS

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:39

>>2
Linux is an operating system therefore it sucks.
Water is a liquid therefore it is wet.
You put sage in a name field therefore you are seeking all gay experiences.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:46

>>4
Sage your contribution free posts

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

>>5
But I am not an queer!

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:35

Some distros ship kernels with no forced preemtpion model. Check that.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:24

I'm copying 200 GB of CP to a Truecrypt partition

FTFY.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:33

Who really needs that much CP?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:52

which cp
GET IT? I DON'T THINK SO!

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:57

>>10
/bin/cp

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 19:44

Windows sucks. I'm copying 50 GB to Truecrypt partition and it freezes system every one minute. Who wrote IO? Some moron, apperantly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 19:47

>>10

man cp

:(

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 22:09

VAX/VMS sucks. I'm copying 50 MB to SYS$SYSTEM directory and it freezes system every 20 seconds. Who wrote IO? Some moron, apperantly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 23:42

ENIAC sucks. I'm copying 50 B to the secondary magnetic tape reel and it burns a vacuum tube every 10 seconds. Who wired IO? Some moron, apperantly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 23:45

The printing press sucks. I'm trying to copy 1 book and it needs plates changed every 500 words.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 0:13

>>7
what does this mean?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 3:00

>>17
THE FORCED PREEMPTION OF CODE, THREAD SUSPENDED.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 11:44

I was taking a look at the IO subsystem in the kernel sources, looks like someone tried to hack in a minimal garbage collector instead of using the traditional kernel slab allocator. Hence your system free during the GC collection every two minutes. Fucking retards using GC in the kernel! Next, they'll be trying to using dynamically and weakly typed languages in kernel modules, because that's what they were taught was superior by the a GC-biased academia.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 11:52

I suck. I'm copying X characters to reply box and I recognize my worthlessness in this ecosystem every two seconds. Who wrote OP? Some faggot, apperantly.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:10

>>19
C is such an improvement over weakly typed languages (if you don't get it, that's sarcasm)

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:32

>using GC in the kernel
LINUX QUALITY

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:43

>>21
At least it's static.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:45

I'm writing a kernel in Python.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:01

Everything in Linux sucks. For example, when I close "Nautilus" file manager window, it doesnt terminate program, but puts it in background. Why? To leak more CPU and memory!
The xfce4-menu-plug already ate 140 megabytes of memory, and it's just a toolbar! When I try to `kill -S gnome-screensaver`, it blanks whole screen and only reboot helps. Gedit (a simple notepad) takes whooping 60 megabytes to edit a few lines of text and it loads about 10 seconds! Opening a directory in files browser sometimes takes minutes, due to its file type detection feature (it scans and makes thumbnail of every file). Thousands of thumbnails stored inside ~/.thumbnails slow down image viewer startup by about 20 seconds. Invoking `cat` on a binary file damages terminal output and sometimes crashes bash.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:06

>>25
Also, file type detection is extremely glitchy and detects unrelated files as PCX files. It also ignores it's extension. So if it detect JPEG file as PCX, it will open it as PCX and crash viewer, despite that it has JPG extension.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:07

>>23
Real static type systems doesn't have void*, implicit conversions, and the ability cast anything to anything.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:13

>>25
I remember Windows 95 notepad opening whole 1-megabyte Lords of The Rings TXT book in under a second.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:15

>>28
Even fucking ZX-Spectrum was faster than Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:46

>>27
void* and typecasts are features, nobody forces them upon you. And the implicit conversions of C actually make sense.
Contrast that with dynamic languages, where you are forced to bear with the lack of compile-time checking.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:50

>>30
Please, define "type". Hope it isnt an "infinte set" of "objects".

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:59

>>31
A mapping of operators to assembly instructions.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 14:05

>>32
I can set-up this mapping using Lisp-macros. No need for C/C++.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:06

>>33
Lisp is a toy language. No serious project has ever been written in Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:50

>>34
define "serious project"

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:52

>>35
define "define"

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 16:33

>>36
(define '(define "define"))

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 16:44

>>17

cd /kernel sources/

make menuconfig

Processor Type and Features --> Preemption model

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 20:55

http://img.0chan.ru/c/src/13166528181243.png

bump with inflamatory image

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 21:23

>>39
CP WARNING! DO NOT CLICK!
Reported this thread because of that. Get a life you sick loser.

Linux sucks

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 10:47

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:11

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:58

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:39

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:46

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:35

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:24

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:33

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:52

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:57

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 19:44

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 19:47

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 22:09

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 23:42

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 23:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 0:13

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 3:00

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 11:44

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 11:52

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:10

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:32

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:43

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:45

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:01

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:06

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:07

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:13

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:15

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:46

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:50

32 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 13:59

33 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 14:05

34 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:06

35 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:50

36 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 15:52

37 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 16:33

38 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 16:44

39 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 20:55

40 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 21:23