/prog/ - clixing on anchor linx

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 7:48

are they recorded? for example, if i go to www.coolmovies.com and i clix on link to www.coolmovies.com#gaysex, is it possibble to record it by webmasta?

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 8:46

Yes with HTML5.
and jQuery

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:36

Javascript is enough to do it

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:49

>>2
>>3
how??

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:06

bumop

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:36

>>3
Javascript
GC is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:38

>>6
Fuck off and die.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:44

>>8
No, You is a pro-GC pile of shit!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

>>1-3
He asked if it's possible for the "webmasta" to record that he clicked on a link, not the browser. That question is so obviously retarded that I refuse to answer it, but your answers are incorrect.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

>>8
Segmentation fault.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 16:31

>>9
u dont know

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:14

Simply HTML5 way would be to do:

window.onhashchange = function() { alert(location.hash) }

But of course you don't know if the browser implements onhashchange, so what you need to do is rewrite every link to end with !hash instead of #hash. This causes an (easily trackable) GET request to be sent to the server. The server can use mod_rewrite to respond with 302 to the original file with a #hash.

Bonus points if you combine the two approaches.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 2:06

>>9
obviously retarded
u

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 5:41

up!!!
>>12
good post +1

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 6:28

>>9
Add onclick event on link, send XHR, [spioler][bold][itlalic]HAX MY ANUS|\italic][\bold][/spoils]

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 9:03

>>6
This got me thinking — disregarding the actual GC "debate", running code written by ``web developers'' without automatic memory management would be suicide.

Even if GC killed your parents, you'd be stupid not to want a GC'd language for your browser.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:06

>>16
You'd be stupid to want to run any untrusted code in your browser. Web code should be native code run in a restricted subtask. Note that the kernel "collects garbage" by reference counting VM objects.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 10:30

bvdjbvcdfg

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 13:12

>>17

"Web code should be native code"

portability... heard of it?

clixing on anchor linx

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 7:48

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 8:46

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:36

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:49

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:06

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:36

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:38

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:44

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 16:31

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:14

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 2:06

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 5:41

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 6:28

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 9:03

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:06

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 10:30

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 13:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 7:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 8:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 9:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 11:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 14:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 15:00

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 16:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-20 18:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 2:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 5:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 6:28

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 9:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-21 12:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 10:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-22 13:12