Use Clojure everyday

It makes Lisp less annoying.

(> "((((()))))"  "([([()])])")

(better-than lisp clojure)

>>2
Incorrect. Clojure also reduces the number of parens, so it has to be (> "((((()))))" "([()])")

use python errday

Fuck clojure. I'm all about Scala.

>>6
Wow, what a shitty choice. Scala tries to be Haskell and Java at the same time and fails at both. You don't create a good language by merging two opposite approaches to programming and trying to please everyone.

And enjoy your memory leaks: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/b18f9006c068f0a0

>>7
Wow, what a shitty choice. Clojure tries to be Lisp and Java at the same time and succeeds, effectively forming a fusion of the shittiest language on the planet.

>>8
Clojure tries to be Lisp and Java at the same time
Absolutely wrong. Clojure doesn't support traditional Java-style OOP and uses immutable data structures by default which is a complete antithesis to the OOP mechanics where everything is based on objects with mutable state. Scala, on the other hand, has an analogues to Java OO system.

Java influences reach only an extremely small set of primitives used for interoperability in Clojure. They are optional and in no way essential to the language.

I understand, you might be frustrated, but try to stay at least marginally factual in your emotion-driven responses.

Clo_jure

Clo_jure