Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Why no FELICS?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 0:35

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FELICS

If it's so much better than PNG, why there is no implementation? Looks like storage device manufacturers conspiracy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-18 1:01

JPEG-LS is the emerging ISO standard for lossless/near-lossless compression of continuous-tone images. Marcelo Weinberger says about it:

JPEG-LS is being developed by ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG1 (final committee draft document FCD14495-1 as of July 1997), and it is based on HP's LOCO-I algorithm.[3]

The main feature of JPEG-LS is its superior placement in the compression/complexity trade-off curve. Tested over a wide variety of image types, it was shown to be, on the average, within about 4% of the best available lossless image compression at a fraction of the complexity. In particular, JPEG-LS significantly outperforms FELICS and lossless JPEG Huffman at similar levels of complexity (it also outperforms lossless JPEG arithmetic, which is of significantly higher complexity). [...]

A software implementation of JPEG-LS, is now available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/loco/ There, the DCC'96 paper on LOCO-I is also available. The standard draft is also available through a link to the official JPEG Web site.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List