>>23
Now where are the docs?
http://www.1024cores.net/
http://mc-fastflow.sourceforge.net/
http://threadingbuildingblocks.org/
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd504870.aspx
http://libdispatch.macosforge.org/
http://openmp.org/wp/openmp-specifications/
http://www.khronos.org/opencl/
>>24
You will never see CPUs running on air-cooling or conventional water cooling clocked at more than 5GHz reliably. You will have to discover new physics that gets around the laws of thermodynamics. I don't even want to hear you mention ``but quantum-computing!'' because that would only show how utterly retarded you are. Graphene looks promising, but it still won't get you over ~8GHz reliably for a general-purpose CPU, where you can run a machine 24/7 on air-cooling without worrying about faults.
However, you will see CPUs with 256-cores on-die each clocked at 1.5GHz - 2.0GHz once we get down to 8-12nm. Personally, I'll take what I can get without being a faggot bitch about it like you.
Also, what are you doing using faggot 32-bit x86 SISD ALU instructions when you could have just used a single 128-bit SSE instruction in 64-bit mode:
movups xmm0,[rsi+8*rdi+12345678]