/prog/ - Common Lisp or Scheme?

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-09 23:13

I'm going to get some basics on functional programming. But there are too fucking many LISP dialects. I know all in all it's all the same shit, but between the two, which one should I use for these little studies?

(And yes, SICP is part of them)

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:33

>>40
define "broken"

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:38

>>41
begin-for-syntax syntax-e syntax->datum syntax->list syntax-property #' (void) quote-syntax datum->syntax syntax-parameter-value syntax-rule raise-syntax-error internal-definition-context? syntax-parameterize make-set!-transformer prop:set!-transformer free-identifier=? syntax-local-value/immediate syntax-local-transforming-module-provides? syntax-local-module-defined-identifiers syntax-local-module-required-identifiers make-require-transformer (require (lib "stxparam.ss" "mzlib")) syntax? (require mzlib/defmacro) define-macro syntax-local-lift-expression (require racket/stxparam-exptime) make-rename-transformer syntax-local-require-certifier make-parameter-rename-transformer syntax-local-value define-syntax-parameter make-provide-transformer syntax-local-provide-certifier syntax-source local-expand/capture-lifts local-transformer-expand/capture-lifts syntax-local-lift-values-expression syntax-local-lift-module-end-declaration syntax-local-lift-require syntax-local-lift-provide syntax-local-name syntax-local-context syntax-local-phase-level syntax-local-module-exports syntax-local-get-shadower syntax-local-certifier syntax-transforming? syntax-local-introduce make-syntax-introducer exn:fail:syntax make-syntax-delta-introducer syntax-local-make-delta-introducer syntax-case define-syntax syntax-rules with-syntax syntax-position syntax-line syntax-column

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:44

>>42
Your answer shows that you're out of viable arguments. I will interpret it as your surrender.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:48

The answer is clearly Fjölnir

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 0:06



*

"GRUNNUR"

;

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 7:35

>>1
CL is butt-ugly, Scheme doesn't even have a remotely usable standard - to get ANY (non-trivial) work done, you will get some sort of vendor-lock-in in all environments.

I suggest Erlang.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 8:10

>>46
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 8:24

>>46
You might as well learn Prolog while you're at it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 9:47

>>48
Except that those languages are completely different.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 10:09

>>49
Completely.

Common Lisp or Scheme?

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-09 23:13

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:33

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:38

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:44

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-10 19:48

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 0:06

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 7:35

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 8:10

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 8:24

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 9:47

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-08-11 10:09