Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Lazy programming is terrible

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 13:25

Lazy programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want monads you can use them without lazy. There's no reason to ever program in a lazy language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 13:31

Lisp can be lazy too.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 13:57

Lisp programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want monads you can use them without lisp. There's no reason to ever program in a lisp language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn python.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 14:00

Python programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want monads you can use them without python. There's no reason to ever program in a python language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn design patterns.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 14:04

>>3-4
You both failed.
Lisp programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want parens you can use them without lisp. There's no reason to ever program in a lisp language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn python.
and
Python programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want indentation you can use it without python. There's no reason to ever program in a python language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn design patterns.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 14:04

Design patterns programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want CommandAbstractFactories you can use them without design patterns. There's no reason to ever program in a Java language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult corporate drones. Grow the fuck up and learn Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 14:09

This meme is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want spam you can do it without kopipe. There's no reason to ever copy-paste. You're just a bunch of cargo cult DQN. Grow the fuck up and learn HMA.

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-28 21:37

Lisp programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want to wear your sister's black leggings you can use them without asking her. There's no reason to ever program in a lisp language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn python.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 4:32

lsip

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 5:05

Copy and paste programming is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want code reuse you can use it without copy and paste. There's no reason to ever program in a copy and paste language. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn OOP.

Name: FrozenDog !!QSvwrQMMkoH22b4 2011-11-19 6:08

Anonymous posting is the worst fucking thing even you stupid cunts. It's less efficient and impossible to reason about. If you want anonymous you can use it without anonymous BBS. There's no reason to ever post in an anonymous fashion. You're just a bunch of cargo cult hipsters. Grow the fuck up and learn tripcodes.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 11:39

FUCKING

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 12:13

>>10
fexpr = copypaste

macro fail

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 15:09

Lisp is fucking shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 15:39

>>2
lisp is slow not lazy

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-19 17:09

>>15
$ cat > test.hs
f :: Integer -> Integer
f = f' 0
  where f' a 0 = a
        f' a n = a `seq` n `seq` f' (a + n) (n - 1)

main :: IO ()
main = let x = f 1000000
         in x `seq` return ()
$ ghc --make test.hs -O3
[1 of 1] Compiling Main             ( test.hs, test.o )
Linking test ...
$ time ./test

real    0m0.031s
user    0m0.024s
sys    0m0.008s
$ cat > test.lisp
(defun f (n)
  (labels ((iter (n a)
             (declare (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0)))
             (if (= n 0)
                 a
                 (iter (1- n) (+ n a)))))
    (iter n 0)))

(time (progn (f 1000000) nil))
$ sbcl --script test.lisp
Evaluation took:
  0.011 seconds of real time
  0.012001 seconds of total run time (0.012001 user, 0.000000 system)
  109.09% CPU
  22,118,032 processor cycles
  0 bytes consed

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-20 13:39

Lisp=Shit

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List