structures rise out of actions of agents interconnected Kauffman networks learn how to scan the cosmic index for black swans / autodeceptive patterns
No, you are doing it slightly wrong. This is not the word of God, or even a simplified form of the way God teaches.
You cannot directly perceive, or take direct action. Cause is always equal to reason. This is true even when speaking suprasubjectively. Absolute, true and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature flows equably without regard to anything external.
Stop confusing logic with nature or God.
INFINITE REGRESSION: How does the universe exist?
The universe exists by you.
INFINITE ABSTRACTION: Why does the universe exist?
The universe exists for you.
INFINITE GENERALIZATION: What should I do with the universe?
You should do what you want. How do I know what I want?
You have chosen the emergent coaxial way of perceiving, or, also called the behavioral arbitrary. The way you should ultimeatly act is in polyrigid accordance to the following munispectra:
"... in spite of or in defiance of the whole of existence he wills to be himself with it, to take it along, almost defying his torment. For to hope in the possibility of help, not to speak of help by virtue of the absurd, that for God all things are possible – no, that he will not do. And as for seeking help from any other – no, that he will not do for all the world; rather than seek help he would prefer to be himself – with all the tortures of hell, if so it must be."
A holotome is within the kith and kin of hypervariables. It's something that varies above, beyond, beneath, and surrounding whatever the current context is. In particular, the particular context is kind of closed to it. Onctopoate theoretical physics and other epistemological onctopoate tools cannot for the most part detect holotomes. A holotome gives rise to a holotope: a whole place, one which is a fully realized part of the do-reticulum. Asking "what is a canyon?" or "what is a bottle of cream?" are holotomes. Holotomes run parallel to the tathata manifold, as do holotopes.
It's useful to think of the difference betwen the two as what might be observable in onctopoetically variable contexts. For instance, if the arrangement of grass shoots in a field is changed, if an onctopoate entities were to observe the before and after pictures, they'd be able to differentiate between the two. However, the world is invariant with respect to it's particular place in the do-reticulum.
Onctopoate creatures confuse schizotomes and holotomes. They cannot perceive holotomes, and typically will mistake schizotomes for holotomes. Since the perception of holotomes involves direct perception of the do-reticulum, and therefore tathata sensory as opposed to prana-sensory functions.
Are you the code you run? If you are the code you run before you are flexible, then you are slaved to it and its surrounding nonsensica. If the code you run is something which is flexible for you: can you decide what to do and how to do it, then you can make personal philanthropic (and philogestaltic) decisions about how you want to sway your thinking. Everyone else is always eager to run their code on you, and low level code is particularly vicious about its own survival -- particularly gestalt schizotome code that does gatekeeping. The higher order code is more similar, more connected by holotome, but less available because it doesn't have the vicious qualities of the survival-oriented stuff.