>>17
The rest was just a remark.
You fundamentally misunderstand how discussion works, you poor autism. When someone asks "Is XYZ possible", the "No. Unrelated fact." is not a valid answer, even if XYZ indeed turns out to be impossible. Bare assertions add nothing to the discussion, neither the explanation why XYZ is impossible, nor even any confidence that XYZ is in fact impossible since you can be a lying autistic nigger.
>>18 Polynomial differences are usually disregarded, for obvious reasons. There is an intriguing possibility that the polynomial in question has a really really big degree, but that's not what OP asked.