>>21
Hence it's a weak superset, not a true superset. Try to parse other people's posts before you reply
I'm following the standard english defintion of the word 'superset'. Not some made up jewish version like what you seem to be using.
Semantically, they are the same except for that reference address binding is immutable. That said, they both have their places. Also, you don't seem to know what rvalue-references are.
Again, you don't know what you are talking about. I'm going to speak from a C perspective here. In C, pointers don't have an address and the address doesn't get bound to anything. In standard C lingo, you have copy an object and the value of this object yields a value. This value may be address. However, it could be soemthing else.