>>6
I actually wonder what makes this one particular spammer (
>>5,7) so persistent. Something about Lisp must hurt him in a special way, but he never quite expressed what it was... maybe he couldn't understand SICP, or maybe he couldn't set up Emacs or maybe he feels inferior to his peers who can perform those tasks. We will never know, unless he decides to give a honest answer instead of just spamming every Lisp thread (not that this particular thread has any value(everyone who uses Lisp for actual work already knows what the strengths and weaknesses of this particular family of languages is as well as how it compares with other languages), I could even imagine it was made by the same spammer so he could have a place to spam).