/prog/ - Closures

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 0:34

can someone explain them to me.. I'm thinken they might be simple but my pee sized brain can't comprehend most definitions off of google

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:34

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POP-2
An interesting operation on functions was partial application, (sometimes referred to as "currying")

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:35

>>41
Wikipedia is full of shit, that's something new.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

>>40
No, you're ignorant in general.
I know Lisp. Other languages are so mediocre, that there is no shame being ignorant of them.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

>>42
Nope. Haskell is just to hard.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

>>43
It's not about languages, it's about you being ignorant. Using Lisp doesn't make you a genius.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

>>44
Curry and papply are not Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:38

>>46
C++?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:39

>>47
No, they are not any language. You ignorance is showing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

>>45
But we're talking about language (haskell in particular)!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

>>48
Then they're useless.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

>>49
No, we're talking about you and how stupid you are.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

>>50
You use partial application everyday.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

>>51
Better being stupid, than brainwashed with Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

>>53
I don't use Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

>>52
You see the works of God everywhere!

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:43

>>54
You know Haskell and proud of it. That's enough to condemn you.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:44

>>55
The only things you can say are God, Haskell, C++ and Jewish? Lisp is as jewish as Haskell, lambda comes from the jewish lambda calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:45

>>56
I know Haskell and it disgusts me, I have a reason to not like it, because I know what I don't like. You still are ignorant.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:46

>>57
lambda comes from the jewish lambda calculus.
Right. We should rename `lambda` to `fn` (for funarg).

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:48

>>59
The ``anonymous function'' concept comes from the jewish lambda calculus, any language with anonymous functions and first-class functions is jewish. Stop using Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:49

>>58
Why bother learning Haskell, when wiki article says it's statically typed? Static typing is a reason enough to hate anything outright.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:50

>>61
CL is statically typed. It has type annotations, and typed vectors.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:51

>>60
Who cates about concepts and theory? In practice we call `lambda` a concrete block of code in compiler, that handles (lambda ...) form.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

>>62
They're optional.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

>>63
It still comes from the jewish lambda calculus, Lisp is jewish. It also requires infinite memory, which is also jewish. It is also statically typed, it has type annotations and typed vectors. Lisp is jewish, stop using it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_lisp
Typing discipline dynamic, strong

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

>>64
They are there. Enjoy your jewish language while you suck some jew's dick.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

>>65
define "lambda calculus"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

>>66
Being strongly typed means that types are enforced on you, which means that it is really statically typed. Enjoy your jewish language while you suck some jew's dick.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

>>69
define "types"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:55

>>68
Jewish monopoly. Everything anonymous functions and first-class functions are there because of the jewish monopoly. Enjoy your Lisp being jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:56

>>70

This is SBCL 1.0.48, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.

More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>;.



SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.

It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under

BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the

distribution for more information.

* (type-of 2)



(INTEGER 0 536870911)

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

>>71
define "being jewish"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

>>70
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/26_glo_t.htm#type_specifier
type n. 1. a set of objects, usually with common structure, behavior, or purpose. (Note that the expression ``X is of type Sa'' naturally implies that ``X is of type Sb'' if Sa is a subtype of Sb.) 2. (immediately following the name of a type) a subtype of that type. ``The type vector is an array type.''

Lisp is jewish, enjoy your jewish language.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

>>72
So, where is the definition of "type"?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

>>73
Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

>>75
At >>74

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

>>74
define "a set of objects"

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59

>>78
It's all about the set theory you hate so much, which is jewish, Lisp is jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59

>>77
define "a set of objects"

>>76
justify.

Closures

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 0:34

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:34

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:35

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:38

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:39

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

52 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

56 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:43

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:44

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:45

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:46

60 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:48

61 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:49

62 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:50

63 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:51

64 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

65 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

66 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

67 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

68 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

69 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

70 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

71 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:55

72 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:56

73 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

74 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

75 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

76 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

77 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

78 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

79 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59

80 Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 0:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:49

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:53

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:54

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:55

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:57

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 4:59