Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Closures

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 0:34

can someone explain them to me.. I'm thinken they might be simple but my pee sized brain can't comprehend most definitions off of google

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 18:12

>>160
That's called applying for grad school dude.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 18:20

>>161
Nope. Bombing schools is a way to express your protest.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 18:30

>>162
Hardly productive and cannot have any positive outcome. Your disatisfaction with current mathematical formalisms won't go away. The only way to make that go away would be to build something.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 18:46

>>163
Hardly productive and cannot have any positive outcome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_of_the_deed

would be to build something.
You can't build on an occupied territory.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 18:51

>>164
How is your mind, paper, computer and its memory ``occupied territory''? People make up new stuff all the time. If you looked hard enough, you might even find things you might like.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 19:42

>>165
Job market is an occupied territory. You can't just replace Unix with Lisp OS. You can't replace Set Theory language with any other language. It's very hard to replace IPv4 with IPv6, even when major forces are interested. Replacing Set Theory with a Lisp-based language would meet opposition from the whole science community, which religiously conservative to no end.

"No one shall expel us from the Paradise that Cantor has created." -- words of modern scientist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 19:54

>>166
Which scientist?

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 20:04

>>166
It's a strawman. He ascribes sweeping generalizations to various groups then uses that strawman to further his argument.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 20:36

>>168
Nope. It's all the same: Set Theory is a language. It's value is in opportunities it provides, like getting a programming job or reading information, encoded with Set Theory.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 20:39

Closures are Lisp-like programming languages designed to compile to JVMs.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 20:40

>>170
No, those are Clojures.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-23 21:16

<3 closures

Name: deppricated 2011-05-24 3:35

deppricated

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 15:03

closures are useless unless you wanna claim you're a master programmer

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 16:14

Closures are just syntax sugar for Java classes. Lazy programmers like them because there lazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 17:03

Java classes are just syntax sugar for closures. Lazy programmers like them because there lazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 17:12

Lazy closures are just syntax classes for sugar. Java programmers like them because there lazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 17:33

Syntax closures are just lazy classes for Java. Sugar programmers like them because there lazy.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 17:39

4 posts and not 1 correct use of there

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-24 17:40

>>179
1 post, and not one unambiguous use of grammar.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List