>>7
They're bashing Lisp for entirely the wrong reasons. Really, the only reason (which you have no way of working around from within the language) to fucking hate Lisp are all the fucking parens. All the other arguments against it are pure bullshit, since the core design is sane and shitty libraries can simply be rewritten. Okay, maybe there's a point about cons-based data structures not being well-adapted to today's ISAs, but it can be worked around easily via a proper compiler or JIT; or you know, by using (typed) vectors.
>>1
see what I just wrote above