>>48
The world is made of people with different opinions on everything. Wars happen, but we still manage to survive somehow. It's the survival of the fittest, in the end there will be one or zero predominant OOP system for Scheme (just like with CL and CLOS), depending on the needs and preferences of most of the Schemers. And, just like I said before, most implementations have their de facto standard OOP system: you can't write real world Racket code using its GUI library disregarding its class system, since it is built on top of it. But you don't have to use it everyday for everything, no one forces it down your throat, you can use whatever approach you feel will better solve your problem.