>>50
Conciousness is emergent from the inherent nature of the universe through realistic/materialistic means.
You should write a Bible. Like Ron L. Hubbard did, but replace God/Xenu with "realistic/materialistic means".
Under objectivism, conciousness is not necessary to define reality, whereas under subjectivism it is.
Nope. Subjectivism doesn't define anything. You youself define, as you wish. You can extend subjectivism future to so called "consensus reality", when a group of people've experineced their own personal "God".
Subjectivism does not allow for reductionism of the concisousness, and I'm afraid that any philosophy that does not allow for reductionism is inherently wrong.
How can you reduce that, what you can't see?