About the use of sage in /prog/
1
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-18 20:38
Did you guys ever noticed that by saging every thread, in every "answer", you are producing practically the same effect as of not using it at all?
I want to read your opinions on this while I HAX MY OWN ANUS
2
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-18 20:51
>>1
No, you don't understand the purpose of
sage .
3
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-18 20:55
You don't sage threads, but your posts.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-18 21:26
OP, this is fundamentally incorrect. If every post was saged, then /prog/ history would be linear based on the date of creation. If every post was not saged, there is no guarantee of this.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-18 23:01
It's pronounce say-guh
6
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-19 0:13
7
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-19 2:48
8
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-19 5:23
say-dji
9
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-19 6:29
>>1
You fail to understand when we sage and when we bump.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-20 2:29
I see you are all avoiding the question.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-20 3:06
12
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-20 3:07
Most posts aren't worth a bump.
>>12
Show the whole world what's your body's got!
Step into the body shot!
14
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-20 6:38
15
Name:
Anonymous
2011-03-20 7:56
Newer Posts