Sepplecocks

``it's fast bcuz it dont has a gc gc are sloooooow''
Do you still think that? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C++0x#Allow_garbage_collected_implementations
Is C++ now considered slow?

>>21
Yeah, I fucked it up.

>>20
Computers are not Turing-complete.

>>22
Perl, Python, Ruby, Lisp, etc, are all Turing-complete, C is not.
Saying ``C is Turing-complete'' is just like saying that computers are. Remove sizeof on pointers (you can't, you need it for mallocs), then it will be Turing-complete.
The real world argument is for people who either don't know shit of what they're talking about, or that simply can't find arguments to defend their precious ideas. They said ``lol lambdas are not real wolrd deal w/it'', now even C++ has them. Same for GC (not it's optional in C++) and functional languages, now everyone is all ``im using purely persistent immutabel data structture lol''. Your argument is moot.