Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Post Code

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-04 21:33

One recurring complaint is that nobody talks about code on /prog/. So everyone write go and write some code, any code, that does something, anything, and post it. A small explanation wouldn't go amiss either.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 11:02

>>71
You CLISPESR
I don't use CLISP.

should stop wasting all your time trying to force everyone to use your "one true way" and just make it a language requirement (i.e. ONE WORD)
And lose all the advantages of the parens? No.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 11:04

cons :: a -> b -> (a -> b -> c) -> c
cons x y = (\f -> f x y)

car :: ((a -> b -> a) -> a) -> a
car f = f (\x y -> x)

cdr :: ((a -> b -> b) -> b) -> b
cdr f = f (\x y -> y)

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 11:34

>>71
Maybe if there weren't so many damn parentheses, you wouldn't have a screen estate problem in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 11:38

using newLISP to actually get things done
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 12:26

using LISP to actually get things done
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 12:29

>>71
Meanwhile everyone else will be using newLISP to actually get things done.
You mean that one language with dynamic scoping? And with FORCED COPY BY VALUE, except if you use contexts, which are globally scoped and never destroyed?

The language where you can't solve Exercise 3.1 of SICP?

Well, ain't that some shit.

Show me one thing you got done with newLISP, apart from your mom.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 13:35

>>75-76
tl;dr

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-08 14:36

>>78
fuck you faggot lisper
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -