One recurring complaint is that nobody talks about code on /prog/. So everyone write go and write some code, any code, that does something, anything, and post it. A small explanation wouldn't go amiss either.
>>165
This at least shows that the implementation may exist (I'm not entirely convinced as >>163 does seem to miss some strings, but I can imagine those strings being stored in some of those gensyms or whatever - there's too many functions referenced there to which we have no access to actually guess if it's real or not). I still won't retract my view that the ``in LISP'' guy is not a troll unless he decides to post the full implementation of his DSL.