>>31 If you use an old version then it is likely that those functions are still called SYNTAX-OBJECT->DATUM and DATUM->SYNTAX-OBJECT as they were in the original (92?) paper. It works fine in a modern version of racket.
It still wont work. Because Scheme/Racket doesnt have packages, expanded macros would reference local copies of symbols, not the symbols from macro's package. Scheme is fucked-up beyond repair.
>>41 Scheme is fucked-up beyond repair.
And, honestly, Racket doesn't even try repairing. It just adds more useless crap, like call-by-name and static typing, on top of existing pile.
Name:
Anonymous2011-03-03 2:26
>>42
Then why macro in (let ((car ...)) (macro)) macro would reference local copy of `car`?
BITCH FUCK SHITS!YOU NIGGER NAZI ASSES! YOU CAN FUCK HELL! BAN YU ALL! YOU GET BANNED! YOU GAVE OUT MY PASSWORD!I AM THE MOST FUCKING NGGER MATURE! GIVE ME BACK THE PASSWRD!
ASKFHSed?Gsdfghsdfkhgbafgbhbgfhbfs fukk sex you nigger cock pussy! i fuck yhou you have satan you canada ass whovdoesn't beleive in Christ! I HOPE YOU ALL GET RAPES!