/prog/ - Anonymous BBS

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 9:53

Hello /prog/.

Shiichan sucks and is written in PHP. Kareha sucks and is written in Perl (which causes more issues than anything else ever could when trying hard to do so).

Is there any sane BBS software out there or do I have to try and do it myself, despite not being an EXPERT PROGRAMMER?

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 5:17

>>38
You know, I used to be like you. But then I wrote a syntax->sexp processor and shut the fuck up.

Name: do_not_email 2012-09-12 6:53

This one sounds good, though old an untested:
mewBBS C 4.9 Yuto Ikeno
http://9ch.in/overscript/files/mewbbsall.tar.gz

I need to make one in LISP.

Lol someone beat me to it:
himgb written by unknown [ Haskell ]:
http://himgb.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/hImgb.hs

Maybe we should also do Ada and Lua for luadaz.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 9:00

>>40
http://www.horoscope-jiku.com/wp-content/uploads/banner_ss02.png
i see what you did there

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 9:29

DUBBS

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 12:37

>>9
PHP? Scalability? Fuck off back to Stack Overflow.

And Lisp is actually a good idea for CLOUD ENABLED WEB APPLICATIONS that make use of templates.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 16:08

And Lisp is actually a good idea for CLOUD ENABLED WEB APPLICATIONS that make use of templates.
Oh _God no.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 18:48

Perl worse than PHP? Pass the kool-aid.

Name: postimage.org/image/sum0biobr/ 2012-09-12 19:38

There's a reason we call them PPP. I think this thread is done, unless some has one made.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 0:19

OP are you still here?

I'm creating one, tell me your nick on rizon if you're interested.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 1:23

Roll your own. Write it in C++ or C if you're a nigger with FastCGI.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 2:31

>>50
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 2:51

>>50
http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/OO_programming/
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/big-picture.html

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 3:56

>>52
love this one:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/lang-comparisons.html
In 99% of the cases, programming language selection is dominated by business considerations, not by technical considerations. Things that really end up mattering are things like availability of a programming environment for the development machine, availability of runtime environment(s) for the deployment machine(s), licensing/legal issues of the runtime and/or development environments, availability of trained developers, availability of consulting services, and corporate culture/politics. These business considerations generally play a much greater role than compile time performance, runtime performance, static vs. dynamic typing, static vs. dynamic binding, etc.

Anyone who argues in favor of one language over another in a purely technical manner (i.e., who ignores the dominant business issues) exposes themself as a techie weenie, and deserves not to be heard. Business issues dominate technical issues, and anyone who doesn't realize that is destined to make decisions that have terrible business consequences — they are dangerous to their employer.

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 12:00

>>51
Nigger

Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 16:05

>>54
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-03 9:57

http://www.synchro.net/

Anonymous BBS

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-05 9:53

41 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 5:17

42 Name: do_not_email 2012-09-12 6:53

43 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 9:00

44 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 9:29

45 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 12:37

46 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 16:08

47 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-12 18:48

48 Name: postimage.org/image/sum0biobr/ 2012-09-12 19:38

49 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 0:19

50 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 1:23

51 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 2:31

52 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 2:51

53 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 3:56

54 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 12:00

55 Name: Anonymous 2012-09-13 16:05

56 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-03 9:57