/prog/ - Qt4 — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 14:44



'>Install Qt4 SDK

'>Start coding an application

'>Begin to learn about Qt4 innovations

Seriously, WHY haven't I been told about this?

GTK is a horrible experience for coders and sometimes for users and that's what that fucker Shuttlecocks keeps pushing for Linux. I think they need to make a less ricer Qt4 desktop environment instead.

Name: Sage Police 2011-02-03 16:59

>>22,35,38
I don't know who you are, but please, sage your posts.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:01

>>41
sage this

'*grabs dick*'

Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:03

>>40
Your argument implies that it is impossible for a language to be bad. Which is nonsense.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

>>43
'>implying

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

Flag on the moon... how did it get there!?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:06

>>43
No, please reread his argument. He's saying it's irrelevant because the programmer is the real driving force behind bad code, not the language.

I somewhat agree, although it sure is easier to find good Python code than C++ code.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:08

>>40
$LANGUAGE debates are like watching the Special Olympics.

Autists are allowed into the Special Olympics?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:09



public class MyClass : Object /* additional interfaces go here */

{

  public int some_property { public get; private set; } /* automagic GObject property */

  public void my_func(int i) { stdout.printf("Hello from GObject\n"); } /* it's a function... hooray */

}

Name: C++ 2011-02-03 17:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:12

>>48
It looks like GOjbect, C and C# smashing into eachother.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:15

>>46
its not that its impossible, just whether the language is turing complete or not, everything else is just fluff, nobody gives a fuck if you can't work in one style

a programming language serves as tools of computation

if a language is turing complete, then it can compute all that is computable

therefore a turing complete language cannot be bad

Q.E.D

Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:17

>>51
if a language is turing complete, then it can compute all that is computable
therefore a turing complete language cannot be bad

Surely you see the logical leap you are making?

good = Turing-complete

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:18

>>51
>>52

Come on you guys have been going on about this for about two hours now. Why don't you just take a break can go for a walk or something? Hopefully never come back.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:21

>>40
$LANGUAGE
I don't think your opinion is worth anything, PHP ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:25

>>54
3/10 (made me reply)

Name: I'm a !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-02-03 17:46

The problem with C++ is its "backwards compatibility" with C. If it weren't so afraid to be its own language, C++ might actually be good.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

Brainfuck is Turing-complete. Is it as good a language as C++? No? Then we can agree that some languages are worse than others?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

>>57
It's better.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:58

>>58
That's what you're mum said about my dick when comparing it to yours.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:01

http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/g/thread/15730161

What the fuck is going on in here??

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

>>60
/g/ faggots ``raiding'' /prog/ because they are kewl.

Note that some posts (my posts, at least) are missing.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

>>60
Well, that's one way to do... something, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:10

>>60
My mind is full of fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:13

So did we conclude if Qt was good or not?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:14

>>61
Which one were you? And why were you on /g/?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:20

my anus when all of you fags secretly browse /g/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:33

What is this I don't even know what's going on!

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:34

>>64
C++ ergo shit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:39

>>68
C bindings motherfucker

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:44

>>69
Too bad they suck flying dicks.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 22:36

>>70
Too bad you're correct.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:26

>>69-71
Why would you need bindings? Just write C code and compile with a C++ compiler...

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:56

>>72
Compiling C code with a C++ compiler
It doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 7:40

Jesus Christ, I just knew this thread belonged to the other kind of boards.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:38

>>74
The kind that dare not speak its name?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:41

>>21
I remember writing that pasta

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:02

This was actually a better thread than I expected from /g/. Except for that commy guy -- he can go DIAF.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:36

>>76
I remember inventing the pasta-stealing meme

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:56

>>78
I remember buying my own pasta like a lawful chump.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:06

>>74
Voldermo-/g/

Qt4

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 14:44

41 Name: Sage Police 2011-02-03 16:59

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:01

43 Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:03

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:06

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:08

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:09

49 Name: C++ 2011-02-03 17:10

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:12

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:15

52 Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:17

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:18

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:21

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:25

56 Name: I'm a !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-02-03 17:46

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:58

60 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:01

61 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

62 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

63 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:10

64 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:13

65 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:14

66 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:20

67 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:33

68 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:34

69 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:39

70 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:44

71 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 22:36

72 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:26

73 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:56

74 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 7:40

75 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:38

76 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:41

77 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:02

78 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:36

79 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:56

80 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 14:44

Name: Sage Police 2011-02-03 16:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:01

Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:09

Name: C++ 2011-02-03 17:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:15

Name: commy !5laMGKpsGU 2011-02-03 17:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:18

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 17:25

Name: I'm a !Ep8pui8Vw2 2011-02-03 17:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 20:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:34

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 21:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 22:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 23:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 7:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 13:41

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:02

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:36

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:06