>>161
I said that Racket is more intuitive as a language. Haskell's type system bogs shit down. I mean, its like half the language. I might still spend a week or so to learn it well enough so that I can delve into it and master it by writing non-trivial shit but it took me like three days to learn Scheme, one of them just spent on pounding recursion/tail-recursion/continuations into my head. That's all.