>>159
And I posted the first question (Haskell or Scheme) not to debate which one is the better language. You can take the R5RS standard/Racket or the Haskell Prime standard and pump out something nice. I'm talking about how intuitive each one is. Because I like Scheme/Racket (I personally prefer the Racket dialect of Scheme because it supports modules and has much more libraries) because its intuitive. You think of a solution and the answer just comes to you. Haskell's type system, although wonderfully thought out, seems to force thinking into an overly linear direction while still ending up with having the same wonderfully creative tools as Racket. So what do? I want to learn Haskell to learn Math but I already know Racket and... I'm sorry for quoting a fanatical Mac, jewish murderer of anuses, but it just works.