/prog/ - Smalltalk

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 8:16

Why good OOP programming languages like Smalltalk are forgotten, and shit ones like C++ and Java are everywhere?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

>>40
Ugh... IHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

>>39
Forth is a low-level language, Lisp is an high-order, first-class language.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:06

>>42
So?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:07

>>37-42
I'll quote >>36
LISP
It's all in caps, he doesn't know a shit about Lisp, YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

>>44
LISP is a [LIS]t [P]rocessing Language. But Scheme faggots desecrate this holy word by writing it lowercase.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

>>43
It's obvious Forth is untyped.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

>>45
Common Lispers call Lisp ``Lisp''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

>>46
So?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:11

>>39
I've nothing against assembly, as long as its embedded into LISP and uses all power of LISP macros system. Using assembly as a standalone language is retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:12

>>47
You FAIL. Common Lispers spell everything UPPERCASE.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13

>>48
SO FUCK YOU IN THE ASS, LISP IS TYPED AND FORTH IS NOT. THEY ARE BEAUTIFUL BECAUSE OF IT. DISCUSSION OVER

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13



$ sbcl

This is SBCL 1.0.11.debian, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.



* 'lisp



LISP

*

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:14

>>50
`(common-lispers use-lowercase because the-compiler SHOUTS-AT-THEM ,FAGGOT)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

>>51
4 => (integer nil nil nil nil)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

>>52
>>53

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

>>54
In what braindead Lisp implementation?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

>>51
Why are you stating what has already been stated at least two times in this thread in allcaps, buddy? U mad, or something?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

uppercase is oldskool, just like orange terminal font color.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:25

4 => ((()()()) () () () ())

Name: LIS 2011-02-01 20:33

>>59

Name: LISPPER 2011-02-01 20:33

>>60
WHAT THE FUCK I DIDN'T EVEN PRESS ENTER

>>59
No.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:37

Only /proggit/ could turn a shitty thread about Smalltalk into a shittier thread about Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:48

>>62
Then go back to reddit and open a shitty thread about Smalltalk, this is /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:51

>>63
OH U

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 3:38

>>63
Reddit is too busy discussing bing vs google shitstorm. Reddit is always too busy with some shit

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:21

<---- check em

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:22

>>66
I lol'd.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:38

>>66
nice.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:42

QuickSilver is a Smalltalk-to-JavaScript compiler which is written entirely (hand-coded) in JavaScript. It should be complete in a few more days and I estimate that the compressed final version will be about 20kb in size.

Smalltalk applications compiled with QuickSilver run at the full speed of native JavaScript since it is just compiled JavaScript code that is produced – there is no interpreter present.

The language syntax is that of Squeak Smalltalk with one minor adjustment – anything between braces “{” and “}” is simply inserted unchanged into the compiled output. This lets you intersperse native JavaScript into your code; there is no need for “primitive” functions.
http://www.silversmalltalk.com/index3.html

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:48

>>69
I hope you did M-x rep-str TAB RET JavaScript RET [b][u][i][o]JavaScript[/o][/i][/u][/b] RET while using edit-current-field-in-external-editor

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:05

>>70
I use notepad there is no ``M-x rep-str" in it :)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:08

>>71
You for...
mailto:noko

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 13:52

>>72
And? What about it?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:03

>>72
Yeah, what about it?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:12

>>69
Smalltalk applications compiled with QuickSilver run at the full speed of native JavaScript
That almost sounds like sarcasm.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:50

>>75
My other sarcasm is a sdrcdsm.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:03

>>76
U MENA SRDCE

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:47

My other rplaca is a rplacd

Smalltalk

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 8:16

41 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

42 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

43 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:06

44 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:07

45 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

46 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

47 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

48 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

49 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:11

50 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:12

51 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13

52 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13

53 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:14

54 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

55 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

56 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

58 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

59 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:25

60 Name: LIS 2011-02-01 20:33

61 Name: LISPPER 2011-02-01 20:33

62 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:37

63 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:48

64 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:51

65 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 3:38

66 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:21

67 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:22

68 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:38

69 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:42

70 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:48

71 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:05

72 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:08

73 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 13:52

74 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:03

75 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:12

76 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:50

77 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:03

78 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:47

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 8:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:07

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:09

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:11

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:13

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:14

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:15

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:25

Name: LIS 2011-02-01 20:33

Name: LISPPER 2011-02-01 20:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:37

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-01 20:51

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 3:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:22

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 8:38

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:42

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 10:48

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 11:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 13:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 16:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 19:47