BBCODE Abuse
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-21 23:36
You people are such fags. Why is it that you use BBCODE in the most obnoxious ways possible to write the most simple of sentences?
Name:
Doctor Racket
!oRACKeT.F2
2011-01-23 6:38
>>36
Absolutely not, it's more like the
/b/ of programmers for those who can actually program
△
△△
△ △
△△△△
△ △
△△ △△
△ △ △ △
△△△△△△△△
△ △
△△ △△
△ △ △ △
△△△△ △△△△
△ △ △ △
△△ △△ △△ △△
△ △ △ △ △ △ △ △
△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△
△ △
△△ △△
△ △ △ △
△△△△ △△△△
△ △ △ △
△△ △△ △△ △△
△ △ △ △ △ △ △ △
△△△△△△△△ △△△△△△△△
△ △ △ △
△△ △△ △△ △△
△ △ △ △ △ △ △ △
△△△△ △△△△ △△△△ △△△△
△ △ △ △ △ △ △ △
△△ △△ △△ △△ △△ △△ △△ △△
△ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △ △
△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△△
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-23 9:39
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 3:40
Someone give me their random bbcode script
Name:
VIPPER
2011-01-30 4:38
VIP QUALITY is not available in this thread.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 11:15
▲
▲▲
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 18:28
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 18:43
>>1000
You are not allowed to reply to this thread either,
FAGGOT
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 21:54
72 get!
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 22:20
>>48
You go get him, girl
!
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 22:51
what
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 23:22
<--- dubs
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-30 23:36
>>47
EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE EXPERT BBCODE FAILURE
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
|••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••|
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 0:42
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 9:30
<--- check 'em
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 11:18
What am I checking for? I don't see anything worth caring about in your post, dumbass.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 12:14
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 12:30
>>57
so what? nothing there to see and it's pathetically easy to make a post land on a "dub", this ain't the image boards, scum. return there.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 12:48
IT'S HIP TO BE SQUARE!
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 13:31
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 13:37
>>60
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU~~
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 14:54
31*2 get!
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 14:57
0x3F GET
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 15:01
(+ 32 (+ 16 (+ 8 (+ 4 (+ 2 (+ 1 1)))))) GET
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:05
>>64
+ is N-ary, you could have just done
(+ 32 16 8 4 2 1 1)
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:11
(check-em/dubs "66")
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:25
(assert (= (current-post-count) 67))
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:38
>>65
But how many parentheses would that get you? Two.
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:52
>>65
He could just do
(expt 2 5)
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 16:52
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 17:57
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 18:00
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 19:20
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 21:22
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-04 17:59