Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Plan 9 versus C++

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:37

http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9_contrib/1/c++

cfront 3.0.1 as the C++ to C translator

AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:42

Plan 9 versus MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:46

>>1
fuck off fag

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 6:54

>>3
y u so mad bro lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 7:56

>>4
fuck off gay

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 9:02

^hurr

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 23:00

neat

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 23:19

>>1
What's so funny? The original C++ compiler was a C++ to C translator. That's all compilers are anyway, pattern matchers which transform a bunch of structured input patterns into structured output patterns. Doesn't matter if the output is another high-level language, intermediate representation, or machine language.

Using cfront is the least amount of work to get C++ support. They could port clang/llvm, but they would need to do a lot of work in the llvm backend to support Plan 9.

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-18 10:31

>>8
compile sexp to latex

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-18 13:21

A lot of unix-land compilers for various languages emit C and shell out to gcc.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:12

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Newer Posts

Plan 9 versus C++

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:37

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:42

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 3:46

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 6:54

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-13 7:56

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-21 9:02

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 23:00

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-11-17 23:19

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-11-18 10:31

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-11-18 13:21

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:12