/prog/ - Haskell or Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:17

which one is [size=15]better[/size]?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:20

Erlang

Erlang is a simple subset of Haskell, you can learn it very quickly. Lisp is also simple, but its simplicity quickly disappears if you try to do anything complicated.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:45

Erlang is a simple subset of Haskell
So does it have nomads?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:58

Haskell size (2010.2.0.0): 74M
Racket size (5.0.2): 48M
Erlang size (R14B01): 83M
Python size (3.2 b2): 17M

AWK size (original) 65.9k

Need I say more? When I use a programming language, I don't want eighty MEGABYTES of worthless abstractions and message passing. AWK! AWK! Who's a pretty boy, then!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 1:03

>>3
no

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:08

This board isn't about programming.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:10

ask[tt]/g/[/tt]™

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:32

>>4
dosn't awk also require [ccode]mzscheme[/code] to be installed?

and yeah what's in all those megabytes... the linux kernel is smaller than that

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

Haseekel

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

because it's bigger

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 4:24

>>8
awk require mzscheme
What?

>>4
When I use a programming language, I don't want O(n²) algorithms in the standard library and The Forced Purification of Code. I just want to program!!!
Not "zygohistomorphic prepromorphisms". Not "comonadic functors".
LISP! LISP! LISP IS THE LANGUAGE!!!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 5:59

>>11
O(n²) algorithms in the standard library
assoc ?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:05

>>12
hash-ref

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:06

>>12
assoc is O(n).

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 7:58

>>8
There is an awk library written in Scheme, but that is not the standard awk.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:04

>>15
I'd never write something like awk in Scheme.
At least for me, racket takes some time to start. (where ``some'' is not >1 second, but it's still more than C/Perl)

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:08

wow, Erlang is the biggest of the bunch, I think I'll go with that!

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:25

>>14
And you see absolutely nothing wrong with that?

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:35

when did awk become more than a set of macros?

anyways the answer is haskell

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:43

>>18
You don't use long alists, problem solved.
If you need a long alist, you probably want an hash map (>>13).

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:03

access-hash-map-element

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:39

>>21
ur so funnay xd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:44

gethash

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:59

{}

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 11:01

>>24
you can do a reader macro for that, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:21

Haskell is lazy. Lisp is not.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:25

>>26
http://docs.racket-lang.org/lazy/index.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Delayed_Evaluation.html?q=lazy#%28form._%28%28lib._racket/promise..rkt%29._lazy%29%29
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/Standards/R5RS/HTML/r5rs-Z-H-7.html#%_sec_4.2.5

Lisp can be anything you want. Haskell can't.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:28

>>27
What's with the Racket bullshit?>>>>

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:06

>>28
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/Standards/R5RS/HTML/r5rs-Z-H-7.html#%_sec_4.2.5
R^₅RS isn't Racket.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:26

>>27
Except useful

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:40

>>30
That's because you can't use it, ``faggot''.

Haskell or Lisp

1 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:17

2 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:20

3 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:45

4 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:58

5 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 1:03

6 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:08

7 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:10

8 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:32

9 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

10 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

11 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 4:24

12 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 5:59

13 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:05

14 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:06

15 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 7:58

16 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:04

17 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:08

18 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:25

19 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:35

20 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:43

21 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:03

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:39

23 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:44

24 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:59

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 11:01

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:21

27 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:25

28 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:28

29 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:06

30 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:26

31 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:20

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:45

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 0:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 1:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 2:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 4:24

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 5:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 6:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 7:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:04

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:08

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 9:43

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:03

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:39

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 10:59

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 11:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 15:28

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:06

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:26

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-12 16:40