Hey lispers

if you language is so productive as you claim it to be, why aren't there any stock market tools that rule the market?

>>7
That's a very short sighted way of leeching money from the system; it's a zero sum game. This sort of game goes against what the stock market was originally intended for: to attract capital to profitable and efficient companies.

>>12
Idealism is long term pragmatism. Time and time again, history shows that loose, shifty, and short sighted games (such as this example of stock manipulation) eventuates in catastrophes. Just take a look at the current Australian financial markets and Australian economy for an example of sensible prudential regulation and business affairs - the system as a whole has proven resilient to the various international financial problems.

I perceive the biggest weakness for Australia are China and Japan, Australia's largest trading partners. I predict that China's and Japan's problems will eventually catch up with them (I used to predict this would take 'a number of decades' but now I'm tending for two or three decades) causing damage in their capacity to trade with Australia which would cripple Australia's export market.