1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 3:26
"8b 04 9b b8 01 00 00 00 90".split |> map asBase,16,? |> x86deasm
((mov eax [ebx+4*ebx]) (mov eax 1) (nop))
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:05
>absence of syntax
please, tell us about '@,`"#\
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:14
>>10
Real men use
(quote),
(quasiquote),
(unquote) and
(unquote-splice).
How
"strings" and
(#c #h #a #r #s) are syntax? They are data types.
IHSBT
13
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:16
>>11
You still can use list of symbols for them: '(c h a r s)
And what about (a . b)?
14
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:22
>>13
(cons (quote a) (quote b))
Symbols are not strings.
Symbols are case insensitive, case insensitive strings and characters would be pretty stupid, don't you think?
16
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:26
>>14
>Symbols are case insensitive
|whatAboutYourMom?|
18
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:28
>case insensitive strings and characters would be pretty stupid, don't you think?
Older computers were case insensitive. Nobody complained. Character case is overrated.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-22 4:30
>>17
>(eq? 'a 'A)
Get yourself a modern Lisp, like Clojure. Dont be a caveman.