Liar Paradox

Does "Liar Paradox" requires this crappy Axiom of Infinity, that "for all N there exit N+1 > N"?
Because if you don't believe Axiom of Infinity, then for some theory (or program) N, you can't construct it's Liar structure, as it would require more memory than you have physically.

Of course, jews would say, that without infinity there is no mathematics, but why do we need this jewish tendency toward abstraction and casuistry anyway? Can you show us practical usefulness of your deceptive regilious theories, jews?

>>49
Belief in comprehensible world is rational because WE EXIST. Worlds with irrational rules would make it less likely for life to appear, much less intelligent life.
It should also be observed, that our mind itself was evolved in such a way that we are to find patterns and correlations in the natural world. If the world would not be comprehensible, intelligence would not likely evolve, and would probably be pointless.