Liar Paradox

Does "Liar Paradox" requires this crappy Axiom of Infinity, that "for all N there exit N+1 > N"?
Because if you don't believe Axiom of Infinity, then for some theory (or program) N, you can't construct it's Liar structure, as it would require more memory than you have physically.

Of course, jews would say, that without infinity there is no mathematics, but why do we need this jewish tendency toward abstraction and casuistry anyway? Can you show us practical usefulness of your deceptive regilious theories, jews?

A religion is usualyl based on blind acceptance of some propositions.
Math is not based on blind acceptance of any propositions, it merely tells you how hypothethical (and real) systems behave.
If you can't understand the distinction, the foundations on which you reason are broken.