Rerevolutionising Symbolic Computation

Alan Turing and Godels theorems have abolished the pathetic childish platonic view of the universe. In the words of Neitzsche: God is dead.

So called 'modern' computer programming as exhibited by Dijkstra and MacCarthy is still infused with failed platonic ideals -- Guarded command language corresponds to the ten commandements while Metacircularity corresponds to the ancient buddhist concept of reincarnation. Examples such as this abound.

Software crises: The flaws of contemporary computing science are blatant. Subversive anarchistic tendencies arise in development models such as Larry Walls heretical, homocidal and self-destructive Perl 6. Statistical computing and tradings refusal to inebriate themselves with Mandelbrots fractal theory has lead to the current economic collapse. The falsely labelled "immature" rejection of computation by the mathematical community should be seen as another red flag.

I propose a new paradigm of symbolic computation. Rather than castrating our symbols of their meaning we infuse meaning to them just as Salavdor Dali did. Incorperating the symbolic dynamics of Claude Shannon with this, and contemporary cybernetic systems theory leads the subconscious to new insights in the theory of computation.

Using this paradaigm I have accomplished the following great works:

A complete, formally checked, computer generrated proof of the non-existence of God. Inverting Godels ontological work and combining it with Aristotles deep insights led to a symbolic computation culminating in the birth of a new transendencal infinitary lambda logic. One is able to assign truth values to undecidable theorems in this logic -- doing so has a direct influence of physical reality. It is in this way which I was able to construct my non-existence proof.

A fully conscious computer program based on the lingustic work on Noam Chomsky and aspects from the theory of mind due to Dan Dennet and Roger Penrose. There are significant problems not yet solved, in particular i have fallen deeply in love with my computer programs personality and have not yet been able to let it free from its heavenly but false environment for fear of it experiencing suffering.

A first principles derivation of a complete picture of the complexity class schema: P not equal to NP is easily read off my diagram. This diagram has illuminated the true nature of quantum computation relative to classical (turing) computation and symbolic computation. An incredible unexpected result from this work is that symbolic computation is super-Turing. I have been trying to tap into truths of other universes using super-Turing computation but my cyclic string cosmology is not yet complete.

All philosophical problems have been reduced to diophantine equations using ideas from Leibniz language of thought and Lullus Magnas Ars Magna. Maybe are directly solvable using Gospers hypergeometric decision process but I am not well versed in the theory of diophantine equations and there are a great deal of important ones I could not solve. This is on-going research.

Cyclic (holograph) string cosmology is a new physical theory of the multiverse (which I mentioned breifly, previously). Symbolism of M.C.Escher led me to realize so called 'impossible' objects, environments etc. were just a direct realization of other universes. Using high powered particle accelerators (I calculate that they must be three orders of magnitude higher than the LHC) I should be able to not just test my cyclic-string cosmology but using black worm hole technology build portals into other universes.

I am certain you will have found my results quite striking and I wish to start an educational facility to train others in my methods of Symbolic computation. I have asked several universities to admit me as a tenured professor but these arrogant men have generally refused to reply to me or misunderstood my work completely. As I have only finitely many more years to live, and only I seem to understand the incredible consequence of my own work I feel that it is necessary for me to create my own educational facility. A necessary prerequisit for joining is to have read SICP. I am aware that many on this board have done so I consider you an excellent group of potential students. Is anyone willing to apply?

>>1
Look at it this way.

On most browsers, you can bring up your browsing history by pressing Control-H. (No, this is not going to become a discussion of werecows.) On Firefox, this brings up a sidebar that shows up on the left side of the window. If you put your mouse over the edge of the sidebar, the cursor will turn into a different kind of arrow. By clicking and dragging it, you can move the edge of the sidebar back and forth. You are, to put it another way, manipulating the border between the normal window and the history window. By moving the mouse, you can increase the portion of the window devoted to either part. In a more extreme view of this situation, you're increasing or decreasing the amount of existence the sidebar has.

Now, let's apply this idea to something more abstract. Look out your window. If you don't live in a highly urbanized area, you should be able to see the horizon. Think of this as the border between the land and the sky. The land and sky are obviously distinguishable thanks to this boundary. Now, if you were to "drag" the sash between the sky and the land, or to manipulate the border between land and sky, you would end up causing the sky to become larger and the land to become smaller, or vice versa. An effect of this might be to cause something that was just on the ground to suddenly be hundreds of feet in the air. Truly a frightening situation to be in. So, look at it this way - manipulating the border between two physical things shifts whatever balance there is in the interaction between those things. Alternatively, by manipulating the border between two things, you can change the manner in which they exist.

Still, this isn't *that* abstract, since it's still dealing with real things in the real world. Many believe that in this world, there are those things that are true, and those that obviously aren't. This divides reality into two extremes: truth and falsehood. But, since we have two extremes, logically one can imagine a boundary between those two extremes - the border between truth and lies. If one were to manipulate this border, suddenly things that were pure fantasy (flying pigs, for the sake of argument) have become reality - or things from reality have ceased to exist. This is how Yukari is said to have invaded the moon - by manipulating the border between truth and lies, as applied to the reflection of the moon on a pond, she was able to make the reflection of the moon into a manifestation of the actual moon, and so send her youkai army onto it. This is what's truly amazing about Yukari's power - the ability to manipulate the border between completely abstract concepts allows her to fundamentally change reality as we know it (at least in terms of two abstract concepts).