Racket or Clojure?

I'm going to invest a decent amount on time on further learning a Lisp dialect. I'm not learning it just to achieve Satori which I more or less already did, but I want an actual development platform to write my shit in, one that is library-rich, useful for a lot of things, multi-platform, and a state-of-the-art Lisp with support for functional programming, macros and decent programming. Furthermore, I wanted something clean, nice, modern, and a Lisp-1 above all else because of spiritual equilibrium and peace of mind. Considering these requirements, I'm left with Racket or Clojure (did I overlook anything else?). Now, /prog/, which should I invest time on?

Clojure is a fucking piece of shit. I find it hard to understand how anyone can take that pile of misfeatures seriously.

>>16
http://docs.racket-lang.org/data/index.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/srfi/srfi-41.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/sequences.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/for.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/control.html
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/eval-model.html#%28part._.Tail_.Position%29

The only point that makes sense is that you don't like Racket's syntax, but to me it is quite clean and easy to read compared to Clojure's ``explosion in an ASCII factory''.