Java review

Good:

- 5 year olds should be able to learn how to make multithreaded applications
- Cross platform
- Great development tools (IDEs and such)
- You don't have to make/download amounts of libraries to develop great and helpful apps, the standard library is huge

Bad:

- Memory hog
- Java programmers: Herppppp Derpppp, internal char array?? nooo, its a string, what internal char array?? what is that
- No function pointers
- No operator overloading
- Everything is a reference, unless you implement Cloneable, sorry, i prefer "&"
- No #define

I think C# (at least on windows cuz honestly who gives a fuck about linux) is shit loads better then java.

1. Java has this shitty UI that looks like something from a 1990's kid movie.
2. C# has built in shit to work with native code. Java trys to act like it it doesn't exist.
3. OPERATOR OVERLOADING OMG /faint

>>39
1. "Java" doesn't have a UI. A number of different UI toolkits for Java exist, including SWT, which uses the native widgets from your platform and looks exactly as you would expect.

2. Java has JNI, which is also "built in shit to work with native code", in your words.

3. Stop trying to write your own Complex and Matrix implementations, and you won't need operator overloading.